answer: the rosenberg survey has excellent metrics and is highly recommended. on a less scientific basis you can use as a general rule of thumb 1/3 for salaries, 1/3 overhead, 1/3 partners salary. read more →
we are in this business to make a living, so we have to become adept at pricing, billing and collections. one thing that vexes me is colleagues who tell me they never would value price or bill, and then they engage in what i refer to as “reverse value billing.” read more →
some 64% of cpas say one of the chief benefits of value pricing is “transparency.” (aicpa)
automation is a key part of the process.
by 卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间
matching pricing (what an accounting firm figures it can charge) with value (what a client things a service is worth) is always a challenge. a firm may think its capability in compliance is worth a lot, but if the client has nothing to comply with, it puts no value on compliance services.
armed with the latest technologies, accountants can do more than ever – faster, better, and cheaper. but too many accountants are missing the biggest opportunity that technology creates, according to judy trepeck, long a leading figure in the profession.
in her conversation with steven sacks, trepeck, currently senior vice president for customized training at the michigan state cpa society, outlines how cpas can go beyond basic accounting to provide more value-added services. it requires experience, talent, ambition, and, maybe most of all, intuition.
^ click to play the podcast
trepeck provides a framework for any accountant to add advisory services to their menu of offerings.
some of the key takeaways and the full transcript:
i use the word “equitable” because i have charged three completely different fees for the same result. “equitable” refers to the value delivered and charged to the client. but it’s not “equivalent.” and the difference can determine your pricing strategies.
with many accountants now working in uncharted waters helping clients get through the covid-19 crisis, the pricing question is especially important. read more →
client billing can include hourly billing, but it can also include flat-fee, retainer-based and/or value-based billing. most people use one of these four methods. some use all of them or even a hybrid. read more →
one of the most common questions i get from practitioners adding tax resolution services to their service offerings has to do with fees. many practitioners see the benefit of offering flat-fee service options, while others choose to stick with their existing hourly fee model.
these are some example of how i quote fees when running a high-volume tax resolution practice. these scenarios do not represent any one particular client i’ve had. rather, they each represent dozens of similar situations i’ve worked on. these scenarios are the norm if you’re focusing on 941 representation. for completeness, i’ve also added a 1040 scenario as an example. read more →
especially when attempting to use flat-fee pricing, many accounting professionals get caught up in doing anything to win new clients. that’s a mistake. read more →
we all have our own styles. many have different styles for different things. over the years i’ve developed an individual style for negotiating on behalf of clients that i have been very successful with, which i am sharing with you now.
when entering a negotiation, it is very important to have clients clearly articulate their thoughts about what they want. this takes time and patience, along with some prodding and challenging. but if it’s done right, clients will be clear about what they want. read more →
client billing can include hourly billing, but it can also include flat-fee, retainer-based and/or value-based billing. most people use one of these four methods. some use all of them or even a hybrid.
let’s take a closer look at each of them: read more →