mandatory retirement? 4 reasons the firm comes first

elderly businessman with hand on door frameand 6 reasons that firms struggle.

by marc rosenberg
retirements & buyouts

at cpa firms, the concept of requiring partners to retire at a certain age has been around for decades. the mandatory requirement policy has its roots in the “one-firm” concept of managing a firm: the interests of the firm should always be more important than the interests of any individual partner.

more on retirement: you want goodwill payments? give proper retirement notice | retirement plan funding? what funding? | compromise is in order for some goodwill payouts | when retiring partners take a specialty with them | if clients leave, do you reduce retirement benefits? | the multiple of compensation method, fully explained | the ins and outs of aav for goodwill | 5 points to consider when paying out goodwill | how to set terms and limits for goodwill payouts | 4 ways to decide how to pay out capital | partners may balk at guaranteeing retirement obligations

why a mandatory retirement policy is good for the firm: read more →

you want goodwill payments? give proper retirement notice

older man and younger man having meeting at deskno transition – no goodwill.

by marc rosenberg
retirements & buyouts

if there is one takeaway in retirement planning, it would be this: “no transition – no goodwill.” here’s what i mean.

more on retirement: retirement plan funding? what funding? | vesting can cover part-timers, too | compromise is in order for some goodwill payouts | when retiring partners take a specialty with them | if clients leave, do you reduce retirement benefits? | three ways to calculate goodwill payable in partner buyouts, none of them great | eat what you kill? then maybe ‘book of business’ is for you | the ins and outs of aav for goodwill | 5 points to consider when paying out goodwill | clients leaving? time to reduce retirement benefits | 4 ways to decide how to pay out capital | partners may balk at guaranteeing retirement obligations

the best of times and the worst of times…

with apologies to charles dickens, who famously opened his classic “a tale of two cities” with the above, here are two real experiences i had regarding transition, one of which was the best example of retiring partner transition i’ve ever seen and one the worst.

read more →

when compromise is in order for some goodwill payouts

businessmen standing on dollar billtwo ways to deal with the loss of a major client.

by marc rosenberg
retirements & buyouts

sometimes you need a creative compromise for dealing with the issue of linking client retention with goodwill benefits.

situations that could cause a firm to factor in lost clients in calculating goodwill benefits include:

  1. client loss, regardless of who is at fault.
  2. non-traditional services that were not institutionalized and hence, left the firm with the lead partner.
  3. loss of a significant client.

read more →

when retiring partners take a specialty with them

businessman sitting on scales with stack of coins in other traynon-traditional services must be ‘institutionalized’ to be valuable.

by marc rosenberg
retirements & buyouts

the only reason firms pay goodwill-based retirement benefits is to retain the clients managed by the retiring partner.

more on partner buyouts: if clients leave, do you reduce retirement benefits? | why you’ll get less from your partners in a buyout than you might by selling the whole firm | eat what you kill? then maybe ‘book of business’ is for you | the multiple of compensation method, fully explained | 5 points to consider when paying out goodwill | clients leaving? time to reduce retirement benefits | partners may balk at guaranteeing retirement obligations

if a firm were 100 percent certain that all of a retiring partner’s clients would leave the day after the partner settled in at the retirement community, i doubt the remaining partners would be terribly motivated to sign any retirement checks. read more →