partner

4 common carve-outs, 9 challenges and 10 complications of all compensation systems.

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

compensation formulas are the most common system for allocating partner income.

more partner compensation for pro members (go pro here): why firms use partner comp formulas|3 subjective compensation systems | 11 points in designing a partner comp system | 3 tiers of compensation | partner compensation 101|what partners earn and how they earn it | partner compensation: an art, not a science | how partners view compensation: it’s not all about the money | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

now let’s look at some of the better formula systems we’ve seen:

read more →

plus 5 ways to make them more sophisticated.

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

compensation formulas are the most common system used by cpa firms to allocate partner income. indeed, many small firms are not even aware that there are alternative systems available, and they’re puzzled as to why a firm would not want to use a formula.

more on partner compensation for pro members: 3 subjective compensation systems | 11 points in designing a partner comp system | 3 tiers of compensation | partner compensation 101| what partners earn and how they earn it | partner compensation: an art, not a science | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

compensation formulas are most heavily used by small firms, especially those with fewer than five partners. since over 90 percent of all cpa firms have fewer than five partners, formulas are the most common system. but once firms hit the five-partner mark, they find that other systems, mainly the subjective systems described in the previous chapter, are preferable. this will be explained later in this post.
read more →